Best Free Audio Books Online learnoutloud

Robert Peter Gale (Pdf) Radiation – TXT and Kindle ePUB

Grammar Without Tears hRadiation What It Is What You Need to Know by Robert Peter Gale MD and Eric Lax Radiation is an evenanded educational and accessible book on radiation The book covers many forms of radiation like microwaves and radio waves which ave insufficient energy to alter cells to the energetic forms known as ionizing radiations that can alter the structure of atoms Scientist physician and author of twenty two medical books Robert Peter Gale as teamed up with accomplished author Eric Lax to produce a readable and interesting book on an often misunderstood topic radiation This enlightening 288 page book is composed by the following nine chapters 1 Assessing the Risks 2 Radiation from Discovery to Today 3 The Nature of Radiation 4 Radiation and Cancer 5 Genetic Diseases Birth Defects and Irradiated Food 6 Radiation and Medicine 7 Bombs 8 Nuclear Power and Radioactive Waste and Summing Up Positives 1 A well researched well written and even Les rives du Danube vlo, de Ulm Passau handed book Accessible for the masses2 An excellent educational tool that addresses a much misunderstood topic radiation The specter of radiation is so frightening to many people that it eclipses reality 3 Understanding the main differences between the two main type of radiation ionizing which can cause cancer and nonionizing generally littlearm with the exception of ultraviolet radiations4 The main focus of the book is to reduce the gap between what we fear and what is real about radiation Mission accomplished5 The book is full of interesting facts Radon 222 and related radionuclides are estimated to be the most common cause of lung cancer deaths in nonsmokers 6 The book examines some of the cancers that ionizing radiations can cause lung breast thyroid and leukemia to name a few Cells in the bone marrow are especially sensitive to cancer causing mutations from ionizing radiation 7 There are many examples provided throughout the book The two main examples are the Chernobyl reactor building and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power facility The Chernobyl reactor building was destroyed by a steam explosion and part of the Fukushima reactor building was destroyed by an explosion of ighly flammable ydrogen gas8 How radioactivity interacts with Scar humans dose Scientists agree that above a certain dose usually about 50 or 100 mSv there is a linear relationship between radiation dose and cancer risk theigher the dose the greater the risk 9 The authors seamlessly provide Oasis historical scientific context into the narrative In 1914 Rutherford would prove that gamma rays were a form of light similar to X rays but with a far shorter wavelength and thus penetrated deeper than the other rays or particles 10 The difference between fission and fusion The difference between fission and fusion is that fusion reuires a great deal energy to start the chain reaction but fusion also yields vastly energy aydrogen fusion bomb is roughly one thousand times powerful than an atomic fission bomb 11 Thought provoking issues people concerned about global warming are often firmly opposed to nuclear energy yet it is the only immediately available energy source able to substantially reduce carbon dioxide emissions albeit with some inherent but potentially solvable problems 12 Chemistry plays a pivotal role All elements with a 2027 - A Near-Future Fantasy (2027: Near-future feminization Book 1) higher number in the periodic table than thallium atomic number 81ave radioactive isotopes and all isotopes of elements from polonium number 84 and The Spirit of Intimacy higher are radioactive 13 The authors did a good job of establishing what we know to aigh degree of certainty in some areas and where lack convincing data Finally we lack convincing data that early detection of thyroid cancer results in a ealth benefit 14 Putting the number of deaths that can be attributed to radioactive releases in perspective radiation induced genetic abnormalities are not passed from the affected persons to their children as studies of exposed Japanese mothers and their children make clear 15 Some of the well known causes of cancer But smoking a cigarette is in some regards like intentionally inhaling a small nuclear weapon into your lungs Cigarette manufacturers ave known about the presence of polonium 210 in tobacco since the 1960s And some factors that don t cause cancer Nonionizing radiations like those associated with microwaves and cell phones are not convincingly associated with an increased cancer risk 16 The difference between genetic disorders and birth defects Changes in the number of chromosomes are also important For example children with Down syndrome ave an extra chromosome 21 whereas girls with Turner syndrome are missing one X children with Down syndrome ave an extra chromosome 21 whereas girls with Turner syndrome are missing one X 17 And what s not to love about evolution We may wonder why whales and dolphins living in water The Taming of the Tights (Misadventures of Tallulah Casey have their bone marrow stem cells in bone cavities This is because they derive from terrestrial ancestors 18 Interesting topic of food irradiation Food irradiationas the potential to save millions lives than it The Great Exchange harms especially since it very probably does noarm 19 Medical applications of radiation The conclusion that people at The Keys to Tulsa high risk for lung cancer shouldave screening radiological studies remains controversial but presently favors screening 20 A look at nuclear weapons About 50 percent of the energy released by the A bombs was blast energy about 35 percent was thermal energy and only about 15 percent was radiation most of it neutrinos that did not contaminate the area 21 An excellent summary chapter an engaging uestions and Answers section22 Bibliography providedNegatives1 The book warranted charts and diagrams within the narrative of the book2 Intended for the masses the book lacks depth3 The book needed citations 4 Free radicals is a fairly ot topic and warranted at the very least a citation In sum My general rule is that if a book s author feels the need to least a citation In sum My general rule is that if a book s author feels the need to their credentials MD PhD the book is not worth reading so I was pretty dubious about this book co authored by Such and Such MD However I was pleasantly surprised by the balanced approach and decent coverage of the topicThat said while this was probably as as good a coverage of the topic as could be done I didn t find it particularly necessary information for me I m not one of the worry warts who freak out over the idea of radiation and it s not like the book is particularly in depth Everything is radioactive People are concerned about accidents at Nuclear power plant facilities but also with taking X Rays of teeth chest injured limbs CT plant facilities but also with taking X Rays of teeth chest injured limbs CT of chest and abdomen sunlight and tanning booths and also radio waves from cell phones And also we umans are concerned about irradiated foodsWe should be aware that Radon 222 is found everywhere on earth trapped in un ventilated basements and is linked to lung cancer in non smokersYou can get a radon test kit for 10 to 15 This might not include the reuired lab fee Points I thought important1 Why irradiate foods It is important to sterilize to stop bacterial contamination of foods E coli in meat or salmonella in eggs can be detrimentalThere is a 1986 documentary by the National that showed ow mangoes and baby chicks are irradiated with Cobalt 60 rods to reduce Salmonella and increase shelf life That s 33 years agoThe Environmental Protection Agency reports thata Irradiating food kills bacteria and molds that can make people sickb Irradiation does not remove toxins that are already in food Irradiation breaks chemical bonds to stop bacteria and other pathogens from multiplyingc Irradiation does not make food radioactivePasteurizing milk and pressure cooking canned foods are other ways to kill bacteria in food2Nuclear terrorism is a worry3 Astronauts and cosmonauts are exposed to igh doses of radiation in spaceI noted the importance of testing for Radon in your The Reality Creation Technique home The air pressure inside yourome is usually lower than in the soil surrounding the foundation This difference in pressure draws air and other gases including radon from the soil into your Flirtation (Shifters Forever After, homeRadon can enter aome any place it finds an opening where the What She Wanted house contacts the soil cracks in foundation walls and in floor slabs construction joints gaps around service pipes support posts window casements floor drains sumps or cavities inside walls This is an interesting book covering valuable information The list of resources are extensive and just for this compilation the book is worth accessing Take a look at The Encyclopedia of EarthThe authors also recommend their website wwwradioactivebookcom One almost needs a science background to understand this book And even if you tough it out andang in there until the end there are few take aways Many times the authors simply say well it s a complicated issue and there are pros and cons Well gee thanks I already knew that So allow me to save you some time Basically the authors conclude that food irradiation is armless and you also don t need to be concerned about the radiation from microwaves tv screens or computers cell phones or the x ray machines in airports although I wasn t entirely convinced about these conclusions If you re concerned about tanning booths mammograms or dentalmedical x rays the authors simply punt on these issues and say well you ave to weight the pros and cons without really providing any other advice or guidelines The most they suggest is to ask your physician whether an x ray or procedure is really necessary Thank goodness this was a library book and i didn t waste my money purchasing it This book read like a public pamphlet on radiation than a book It is clear and well explained and is much broadly focused It does a good job of explaining cesium 137 and iodine 131 and Ars poetica how they affect us during a possible fallout scenario The main gist is that we are surrounded by radiation be it through background cosmicterrestrial or man made medical screeningsx raysPETCTairplane flights and so radiation via nuclear power plants is not as dangerous as perceived There is talk of coal andow the run offs from coal power plants are dangerous than nuclear sources There is a comparison between Chernobyl and Fukushima and Decoding Air Travel how their location and the type of reactor they were led to different results the proliferation of cesium 137 across the globe Informative and well presented I just realized I don tave a book length fascination with radiation Radiation What it is what you need to know is a good book with a somewhat misleading title The authors Dr Gale who Dragon's Curse (The Hearts of Dragons Book 1) (English Edition) has been involved in several nuclear accidents including Chernobyl and writer Eric Lax describe not all aspects of radiation but rather itsealth effects and use in medicine after some introductory material on the nature of radiation Their discussion includes consideration of the effects of nuclear weapons the use of gamma rays or X rays to sterilize food nuclear power smoking and medical screening procedures using radiation Fortunately for keeping the interest of readers the book starts off with the description of an 1985 incident in Goiania Brazil when many people were exposed to radiation from cobalt 60 and cesium 137 when parts from a radiation therapy machine were scavenged by people completely ignorant of radiation and who in one case did not think that the fact that something was glowing might be a bad sign Four people died Much of what we know about the Keys to the Ultimate Freedom harmful effects of radiation exposures is from accidents including Chernobyl or the study of the survivors of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki The surviving victims of these events were generally exposed toigh doses which makes it difficult to extrapolate to low level exposures The authors are very good at indicating when we don t good knowledgeIt as often occurred to me that the word radiation unfortunately is used with regard to two different classes of The essential guide to radiation the good the bad and the utterly fascinating explained with unprecedented clarity Earth born in a nuclear explosion is a radioactive planet; without radiation life would not exist And while radiation can be dangerous it is also deeply misunderstood and often mistakenly feared Now Robert Peter Gale MD the doctor to whom concerned governments turned in the wake of the Chernobyl and Fukushima disas. ,


Robert Peter Gale ✓ 2 Summary

,

RadiationHenomena moving particles of matter which قصه‌های خوب برای بچه‌های خوب --- ۶ have mass and electromagnetic radiation or waves which are mass less From the view of consideration ofuman ealth there is some justification for lumping some of these together because either may result in ionizing radiation More on ionizing radiation latter after some definitions regarding matter and energyIt may be elpful to begin with a useful level of reductionism in describing selected aspects of matter and energy Leaving aside such cosmological puzzles such as dark matter and dark energy the stuff on the Earth is composed of protons neutrons and electrons while electromagnetic radiation is one form of energy Protons neutrons and electrons make up atoms the protons and neutrons in the central nucleus of the atom the electrons outside of the nucleus Protons Rozwazania o Psalmach have a positive electrical charge electronsave a negative electrical charge of eual magnitude to that of a proton and neutrons Grumpy, Frumpy, Happy, Snappy A Silly Monster Opposites Book have no charge Protons and neutronsave about the same mass and the mass of a proton or neutron is almost 2000 times greater than that of an electron Protons and neutrons are not fundamental particles as they are composed of uarks Atoms often combine together to make molecules which is one aspect of the science of chemistry The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom the atomic number determines what chemical element the atom belongs to some common elements on earth are oxygen carbon nitrogen and iron The number of neutrons in an atom s nucleus may vary resulting in what are considered different isotopes of the same element Protons neutrons and electrons can also exist apart from atoms The simplest atom is the most common form of جامع التواریخ جلد 4 فهرست ها hydrogen which consists of a single proton and electron this is by far the most common form of ordinary matter in the universe The second most common element in the universe iselium which Tug Hill Country has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons with two electrons outside of the nucleus The nucleus of aelium atom sometimes emitted from the nuclei of Dragon Ball Anime Comics, Vol. 2 heavier elements during radioactive decay is called an alpha particle Usually the number of electrons and protons in an atom or molecule are eual resulting in an electrically neutral atom but often in the course of chemical reactions an atom or molecule will gain or lose one or electrons resulting in what is called an ion Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy An example of electromagnetic radiation is visible light as are radio waves X rays gamma rays and microwaves Electromagnetic radiationas no mass but it does convey energy that may interact with matter Electromagnetic radiation may be usefully and very oddly described either as a wave analogous to the waves rippling out from a pebble tossed into a pond or as a particle photon Thankfully we can stick to the wave interpretation for this book The distance between successive peaks of a wave is its wavelength the number of peaks passing a fixed point within a second is its freuency The speed of light for all forms of electromagnetic radiation in a vacuum is a very speedy fixed value which means that What Well Leave Behind (Thirty-Eight, higher freuencies correspond to shorter wavelengths The important pointere is that Thirty-Eight Days (Thirty-Eight, higher freuency shorter wavelength electromagnetic radiation is the stuff you mayave to worry aboutSome or all of the different isotopes of a chemical element may be radioactive meaning that the nucleus will undergo a spontaneous change to another isotope or another element Radioactive isotopes may emit electrons from the nucleus not from the electrons surrounding it positrons a form of antimatter a positively charged electron protons gamma rays or occasionally neutrons These changes may result in the change in the atomic number in the remaining nucleus thereby resulting in a change from one element to anotherGenerally the forms of radiation that are potentially dangerous are ionizing radiations forms of radiation that are energetic enough to produce an ion when they interact with matter such as your body Ultra violet light UV responsible for many skin cancers is something of a gray area as UV radiation is not powerful enough to ionize molecules but it is powerful enough to alter chemical bonds between atoms UVB is of particular concern Another consideration is the extent to which different forms of radiation can penetrate the body On Page 14 there is a useful illustration regarding this matter Alpha particles 8 1/2 helium nuclei are stopped by paper electrons are stopped by clothing while gamma rays X rays and neutrons reuire several feet of concrete inches of lead or several feet of water Measuring radiation exposure in a medically relevant form is difficult Straightforward physical measurements don t necessarily capture theealth conseuences of the exposure Further all types of radiation do not Health and Healing for African-Americans have identical effects on living tissue All of the units appear toave been named after dead male European physicists One nucleus decaying per second is called a becuerel B usually its useful to refer to multiples of the B such as the megabecuerel which is a million becuerels The amount of energy a dose of radiation deposits in a tissue is called grays Gy However different tissues are different sensitivities to radiation generally tissues which undergo rapid cell division such as skin or blood cells are sensitive to radiation The most useful unit is the millsievert mSv which considers the biological effects of radiation On average United States residents receive about 62 mSV per year of radiation About Garden of Snakes (House of Royals half of this exposure is due to natural causes the otheralf from New Testament Apocalyptic human created radiation Of the natural causes radon exposure is important about 21000 people in the United States die from exposure to radioactive radon 222 page 18 several thousand than those killed by drunk driving With regard to skin cancers caused by UV it is one of the least common types of skin cancers melanoma which accounts for 70% of the deaths page 117 However adults slathering on sun block are not protecting themselves from melanoma because you are vulnerable to melanoma only if you are immoderately exposed to UVB when age 10 or less page 120 So slather your kids with skin block to protect them from melanomaowever sum block can protect you from the generally less lethal cancers cause by UVAThe vast majority of the exposure to 隠れていた宇宙 [Kakurete Ita Uchū] 2 human created radiation is due to medical procedures or nuclear medicine One exposure to radiation thatad never occurred to me was tobacco smoking apparently fertilizers often contain radioactive radium 226 and its radioactive decay product polonium 210 page 108 Smoking volatilizes the polonium and deposits it in the lungs so in addition to the chemical carcinogens in tobacco smoke there is a radiological aspect to smoking induced lung cancer With regard to medical procedures the using of medical imaging in procedures such as angiogram angioplasty and cardiac CT scans result in the patient receiving radiation doses several times the average American annual radiation dose page 152 Dental X rays chest X rays and mammograms result in radiation doses well below the annual average dose The authors suggest that when doctors suggest a procedure such as a computed tomography CT scan that involves a igh radiation dose the patient should be careful to ascertain that the benefits of the imagery are likely to outweigh the risks Unnecessary medical procedures are the most likely cause of excessive radiation exposure The authors are not terribly concerned with the ealth risks of nuclear power chapter 8 which they deem minimal though they wouldn t put it that way Chernobyl is not a good example because it lacked a containment dome People living near nuclear power plants receive presumably when all is going well an extra dose of radiation of about 00001 mSv annually much less than the background dose while those living near coal fired electrical plants receive a igher radioactive dose due to the concentration of uranium and thorium in fly ash page189 There are also many other day by day negative effects of coal and using other fossil fuels to generate electricity that are greater than the day by day negative effects of nuclear power Their main concern is that the United States needs to find a place to store the waste permanently rather than continuing to let the waste pile up in storage ponds outside of nuclear power plants The total volume of nuclear waste is relatively small so finding enough room to store the stuff isn t the problem The authors also point out that while the dangerous isotopes in the waste take a very long time to decay plenty of dangerous chemicals never decay It seems to me that the basic uestion is whether or not people find the igher steady drip drip drip of deaths from conventional electrical plants and their contribution to global warming acceptable than the possibility of disastrous accident at a nuclear plant Certainly a disastrous accident at a nuclear plant would be worse than a disastrous accident at a conventional power plant The book includes end notes a selected bibliography and an index Since the nuclear meltdown at Fukushima radiotion Satans Mistress has achieved an even worse reputation than itad previously To what extent is this reputation deserved Speaking broadly What My Mother and I Dont Talk About how great a risk does radition pose to us and in what ways does itelp usRobert Gale and Eric Lac the authors of Radition starts by stating a few facts that everyone should know but which many people probably do not know First radiation is present everywhere It is in the ground in the air "in the food that we eat and in ourselves There is no way you can avoid radiation this "the food that we eat and in ourselves There is no way you can avoid radiation this true for non ionizing as well as ionizing radiation Second raditation can kill you Depending on the type of radiation and the dose received radiation may cause a cell to turn into a cancer cell if mutations occur to an unlucky set of genes If a Tagus the Night Horse (Beast Quest, higher dose is received radiation can kill cells and induce radiation sickness The powers of radioactive material can also be used to cause substantial explosions as with the atom andydrogen bombs What I suspect many people don t know is that radiation can also save you Radiation therapy Love Beyond Limits (Among the Fair Magnolias) have saved millions of people and emergency exit signs which shine even when there is no electricityave save many people still CT scans allows us to detect cancers and other things inside the Inochi The Book of Life human body whichelps doctors enourmouslyRadiation is generally categorized as either ionizing or non ionizing Ionizing radiation Gol Atan Kaleye have enough energy to rip away charged particles or molecules If that moleculeappens to be in the DNA in one of our cells that cell may become a cancer cell Non ionizing radiation such as microwaves form cell phones or the visual part of the spectrum that we can actually detect with Our Eyes Cannot Cause This Type Of Damage To Cells eyes cannot cause this type of damage to cells is right on the border between these two with some ultraviolet rays containing enough energy to rip apart molecules which is why you can get skin cancer from overexposure to
The Sun This Also 
sun This also that there is no plausible scientific theory explaning The Age of Disruption how microwave radiation whichas less energy than ultraviolet rays from cell phones cause cancer Togehter with the fact that brain cancer Burning bridges has not increased since cell phones came into use is why Iave no problem with letting my children use cell phones The authors owever focus mostly on ionizing radiationGale and Lax starts with the basics desrcibing what alpha beta and gamma radiaiton is and then going into depth about the amount of radation that an average person receives and the interesting discussion on whether exposure to small amount of radiaiton is bad neutral or even good for you ormesis Regarding exposure the autho. Ters in collaboration with medical writer Eric Lax draws on an exceptional depth of knowledge to correct myths and establish facts Exploring what Rembrandts Jews have become trigger words for anxiety nuclear energy and nuclear weapons uranium plutonium iodine 131 mammogram X ray CT scan threats to the food chain the authors demystify the science and dangers of radiation and examine its myriad benefits from safely sterilizing our food to the re. Rs note that people are uite inconsistent in their fears For instance taking a CT scan which many people even demand will give you the same does of radiation as being 6km from ground zero in Hiroshima Also people tend to be skeptical about being scanned with x rays on airports forgetting that they will receive much radiation during the upcoming flightBut what do the authors say about theot topic of nuclear energy In short they say while there are of course safety issues it is better than coal generated power in pretty much every aspect Renewable sources sun wind water also Refusing His Second Chance have problems associated with them mainly that they are expensive and that they cannot provide a steady stream of electricity without which our economy cannot functionWhat about nuclear accidents though Lets start with the most recent accident Fukushima It is certainly interesting to note that though some people did receive a large dosis of radiation not a single personave died from radiation expsure till this day According to wikipedia the predicted number of Fukushima related cancers range from 0 100 many of which will be possible to treat The tsunami on the other Brand Name Dates hand killed approximately 20000 people The media coverage often suggets that the Fukushima accident was the big news This simply reaffirms that people and the mediaave substantial biases in their fears It is of course or less impossible to tell people to stop being afraid of shark attacks or flying or anything that Confectionately Yours Collection (Confectionately Yours, has radiation in its name but lets not base public policy on irrational fearsWait you say what about the Thernobyl accident Well partly because that reactor exploded due to a clear design flaw 10 times radioactivity was released compared to Fukushima However this should also be copared with atmospheric atom bomb tests which releases 200 times radioactivity than the Thernobyl accident did These are now bannedowever prior nuclear tests The Maiden Dinosaur have causedigh levels of radioactivity in the environment on a global level Estimates of the number of casualties following Thernobyl vary widely and largely depends on whether one thinks that exposure to low doses of radiation increases cancer risks which is a controversial topic We are also dealing with a very Swing Trading with Oliver Velez Course Book with DVD high basal rate of cancers Since 38% percent of all women and 45% of all men will be diagnosed with cancer sometime in their life even say a 05 percent increase mean thousands or millions of people Bottom line Thernobyl was a bad accident and similar mistakes should of course be avoided in the futureowever should we abandon a cheap energy source that almost zero pollution because of one poorly designed reactor and one reactor which was only almost able to survive a major natural disasterNo one who disputes that nuclear power is associated with some risks However what are the alternatives It is striking Angus, Thongs And Full Frontal Snogging how many people simply ignores this uestion I oftenear environmentalist say that they want the entire society to be based on renewable energy I fully share that ambition owever it is currently not a feasible alternative which means that we ave to chose between nuclear energy and burning of fossil fuels to get sufficient energy If we don t use nuclear then we The Emperor of Nihon-Ja (Rangers Apprentice, have to generate or buy fossil fuels Yet no one talks about what type of pollutants are released from fossil fuel burning power plants The authors convincingly show that pollutants from coal burning power plants induce mucharm than waste from nuclear power plants In one year one coal burning power plant releases 720 tons of carbon monoxide a toxic gas 50kg of lead which is poisonous to us as well as to the fish in the lakes where a lot of smoke lands 80kg of mercury 10000 tons of sulfur dioxide which results in acid rain and 37 million tons of CO2 This waste is released directly out into the environment not burried in a mountain like nuclear fuel In addition coal plant workers as well as coal miners develop lethal lung cancer much often than other people To sum up the argument for building nuclear power plants Yes there are risks associated with nuclear power but taking into account energy costs And The Waste Produced Nuclear Power Is the waste #Produced Nuclear Power Is #nuclear power is best feasible alternative availableThe authors also discusses another controversial issue namely whether or not we should radiate food to kill of pathogens In a single year there are 2 billion cases of food poisoning in the billion cases of food poisoning in the mainly in the developing world This number could be drastically reduced by radiating the food which would kill of the bacteria Yes some nutrients would be lost but food lose nutrients when you cook it and that is not controversial The bottom line is that radiating food can save many lives particularly in the developing world and there seem top be no rational argument against doing this if there is I Nora (Sunfire, hope that someone will enlighten meAll in all radiation is a great and accessible introduction to the field of radiation a field associated with a substantial lack of knowledge and as a result many irrational fears among the public The title sounds kind of alarmist but the insides aren t so bad Itad a lot of food for thought and refreshed my memory about what we learned in school about nuclear energy and radiation in general It s pretty up to date as well talking about as recent events as the Fukushima Daikii accident This book is reasonable at addressing commonplace radiophobia and addresses radiation from all sources natural and man made especially medical A lesser amount of attention was given to accidental radiation releases from nuclear power and given it was for primarily this reason I chose to read the book I was slightly disappointed In all though I found it worthwhileI am one of those people who are of the opinion that if we wish to maintain and enhance our standard of living for the future especially if we ultimately decide that fossil fuel carbon dioxide inputs need to be eliminated as much as possible then only nuclear power will be able to maintain us in the energy available standard to which we ve become accustomed More energy makes life productive and enjoyable and long lasting for all We should be efficient about our use certainly but energy abundance give us comfort and choice We would not Sam the Plumber have this under a purely renewable source energy economy So does it make sense to exclude nuclear power on safety grounds from the outset That s a uestion I wasoping the book would elp me answerIn the book nuclear power disasters were discussed just not in the clearest way and the information given was fragmented across the chapters I oped for an answer to the uestion of whether it s actually necessary to cordon off large territorial exclusion zones in response to such catastrophes in the interests of protecting Outside the Paint humanealth I was left to gather the fragments presented in the book and make a judgement about this myself which ended up like thisIn such disasters there three isotopes which convey just about all the radioactivity exposure risk to people in the general vicinity of the release I 131 Cs 137 and Sr 90I 131 is risky but mostly to children and only for a short time about three months overall and only if foodstuffs produced within the affected area aren t temporarily replaced with outside supplies during the danger period In Japan food was Hoopers Pasture from Maine to Vermont handled expertly and most Japaneseave iodine rich diets which tend to make them far less at risk to start withCs 137 is pretty ubiuitous and Historic Hahns Peak has a very longalf life making it especially concerning to the public But this long Deathcaster (Shattered Realms, half life also means that the activity of the element is very low reducing risk Its biologicalalf life is also uite short Out of the Ashes (The Legacy Chronicles, happily further greatly reducing risks touman ealth Any amount of it you do manage to ingest is likely to be excreted again before ardly any of it at all will ave a chance to deposit radioactive energy in your tissue So the great concern over this perhaps second most prevalent element released in an accident is probably misplacedSr 90 as a Six-Moon Trail half life similar to Cs 137 butas a complex biological Mustard Seed Magic half life To our bodies it resembles calcium and so some proportion may end up migrating into bones and teeth where it will probably stay long enough to release a good portion of its radioactive energyThis is pretty much all the bookas to say on those matters two to one in favor of the idea that our reaction to the risks from a catastrophic nuclear accident is ysterical The Sr 90 uestion deserves attention How much of this is present around an accident zone What s the riskSince this is supposed to be a book review I won t detail them ere but I ve encountered various materials that offer me some pretty great Leftover Dead (Trailer Park Mystery, hope for Cs 137 in particular that this is just not enough of a risk touman ealth to warrant massive exclusion zones with their life altering permanent evacuations and costly and elaborate washing and soil stripping operations According to this work people could return to their omes and lives in the zone like that around Fukushima right now if they wanted to and not be at significant added risk for future radiogenic ealth problemsFor Sr 90 while a significant product of fission it s non volatile nature makes it much less likely than the others to escape to the environment in significant amounts during a disaster This may be the best reason to allay concerns with it Sr 90 was of a risk during the era of atmospheric atomic weapons testing and for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors from the fallout nuclear weapons produce This main source of Sr 90 exposure as long been now Breed of Innocence (The Breed Chronicles happily overI 131 seems to be the single biggest risk in a reactor disaster and with its shortalf life within a few months of a point immediately following a meltdown with containment loss it is simply no longer a factor it The Princes Mistress has all decayed away In the early phase people should do their best to avoid exposure if they can but for most it will be enough simply to eat clean food from outside the affected area and follow limited evacuation for those most at risk eg families with young childrenFor people like the Japanese whoave ready access to clean replacement foodstuffs and a diet rich in natural iodine little special action is needed Most are best served by eating outside food and waiting things outFor others like those near Chernobyl in 1986 short term evacuation with supplemental iodine administration particularly to the young would ve produced similarly low levels of risk The impoverished condition of most of the population and lack of a robust food system were main drivers increasing their risksHowever in both cases once the I 131 Immortal Jellyfish has decayed off there s no longer much risk People could move back into the zone and resume life as before To allay fear those who want them could obtain dosimeters to understand and place into perspective the actual radioactivity they are receiving Most people would probably see amounts very close to the original background radiation anyway A few may see and this can be either rationalized in terms of measuring it against statistics an education reuirement attaches to do this effectively Or anyone who feels uncomfortable by the amount they see no matterow small can be allowed to take charge of their lives as before and choose to move away In this way people are empowered to freely identify and manage their risks as they choose just as in other parts of their livesThe important takeaways California here are 1 people are overly fearful of radiation despite living lives continuously within its effects and in some cases depending on it forealth 2 understanding the real risks from radiation may allow us to overcome these fears and make intelligent choices regarding ow we obtain the energy we need to enjoy the lives we desire. Latively low risk fuel alternative of nuclear energy This is the book for all readers who ave asked themselves uestions such as What kinds of radiation and what degree of exposure cause cancer What aftereffects Distant Early Warning (Star Trek (Star Trek: S.C.E., have nuclear accidents and bombsad Does radiation increase the likelihood of birth defects And Somnium how does radiation work Hugely illuminating Radiation is the definitive road map to our post Chernobyl post Fukushima worl.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *